
Burning mouth syndrome (BMS), also known as oral dysesthesia, is a chronic orofacial condition associated with moderate-to-severe pain of burning (or similar) nature that affects the oral mucosa [1,2]. Depending on the etiology, BMS is categorized into two forms as follows: “primary or idiopathic BMS” whose causes cannot be identified and “secondary BMS” resulting from local factors or systemic conditions [3]. Local factors that could lead to secondary BMS include poorly-fitting prostheses, parafunctional habits, dental anomalies, allergic reactions, infection, chemical factors, galvanism, dysgeusia, and xerostomia [4].
Oral infections by various microorganisms such as
Infection by
The clinician should be completely aware of the outcome predictors of the disease to help in the selection of the most appropriate treatment modality for each individual patient. This study aimed to identify predictors of the outcome of treatment in patients with secondary BMS caused by infection with
The 423 subjects enrolled in the study were patients at the department of oral medicine, Pusan National Dental Hospital, who presented with a chief complaint of oral mucosal pain between January 2014 and December 2017. All the experiments were undertaken with the understanding and written consent of each subject, and the study was conducted per the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. For each patient, the following data were obtained: age at presentation, sex, duration of the symptom (oral mucosal pain), complete medical history, and prior treatments or medications received for the symptom. Intraoral examinations were performed by skilled dentists specialized in oral medicine. To diagnose secondary BMS, in addition to
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Dental Hospital (PNUDH-2018-004) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients at the initial visit.
The resting whole-mouth salivary flow rate (RSFR) and stimulated whole-mouth salivary flow rate (SSFR) were measured for 5 minutes [15]. During the measurements of the SSFR, the participants were asked to chew unflavored gum for 5 minutes. An RSFR of >0.1 mL/min was considered normal, and hyposalivation was defined as an RSFR of ≤0.1 mL/min. An SSFR of >0.7 mL/min was considered normal, and hyposalivation was defined as an SSFR of ≤0.7 mL/min [16,17].
Samples for mycological examination were collected by firm swabbing of the surface of the site associated with the chief complaint. The cultures were obtained from Sabouraud’s agar medium at 35°C for 3 days.
The degree of pain was analyzed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The outcomes of all treatments were evaluated as the amount of change in NRS.
All patients received an antifungal agent (nystatin suspension, 5 mL; four times a day). Patients were instructed to place a drop of the gel on the tongue, spread it over the oral mucosa, hold it as long as possible, and swallow it. This antifungal treatment was continued for at least 2 weeks [18] and was stopped if no response to the antifungal therapy was observed. After the completion of treatment, the degree of symptom alleviation was determined. If the symptom (oral mucosal pain) improved by more than 50% (as determined by the NRS at the first visit), the treatment was considered effective; on the other hand, less than 50% improvement was regarded as treatment inefficacy or nonresponse to treatment. The total period of treatment with the antifungal agent was defined as the treatment period.
Patients with residual symptoms such as hyperalgesia due to irritant foods after antifungal treatment were prescribed 0.5 mg of clonazepam three times daily. Patients were asked to dissolve the tablet in the saliva in their oral cavities for three minutes before swallowing [19,20]. This modality of treatment with clonazepam was continued for at least 2 weeks and was discontinued if no response to clonazepam therapy was observed. After treatment, the degree of symptom alleviation was determined.
The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of data distribution. The Mann–Whitney U test and Pearson’s chi-square test were used to compare the differences between the albicans and non-
The numbers of patients with cultures positive with specific species of
When the clinical characteristics of oral lesions in
When the salivary flow rates of
The NRS score did not differ significantly between the
The duration of the disease (the time from the onset of the disease to the hospital visit) was significantly shorter in patients in the
Antifungal therapy showed a significant effect in resolving oral mucosal pain. Especially, all patients in the non-
Antifungal treatment was only discontinued when the discomfort in the oral mucosa did not show any further improvement. Some patients infected with
Considering the factors and clinical characteristics that determine response to antifungal therapy in patients in the albicans group, it was found that response to therapy was dependent on the duration of the disease. Patients whose conditions did not improve with nystatin treatment reported a significantly longer disease duration than those whose symptoms were resolved, implying that the factor most closely related to symptom improvement by antifungal treatment was the disease duration (the time from the onset of the disease to the hospital visit) (Fig. 4C).
Thirteen patients infected with
Four patients who were infected with non-
Many patients present to a hospital with complaints of burning and tingling sensations and discomfort in the oral mucosa. However, most of them have minor erythematous lesions in the oral cavity or slight tongue coatings while some have no definite lesions or no lesions at all. In this study, among the 53
Depending on the fungal species, the response to antifungal therapy is different. The number of patients infected with
In 54.3% of patients infected with
The results of this study showed that treatment with clonazepam showed a positive response in patients with
The present study was conducted to investigate the clinical characteristics of
Based on the results of this study, the authors suggest that samples obtained from a person with oral mucosal pain should first be cultured for the detection of
Soo-Min Ok serves as an editor at the Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain; however, she has no role in the decision to publish this article. There are no other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
![]() |
![]() |